<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ICT and privacy &#8211; Markou &amp; Co LLC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://markoullc.com/tag/ict-and-privacy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://markoullc.com</link>
	<description>Law Firm - Nicosia, Cyprus</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2026 05:01:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.9.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Consent in EU law means consent: Top European Court confirms our views on the application of the law on cookies so far</title>
		<link>http://markoullc.com/consent-eu-law-means-consent/</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2019 13:53:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Latest News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CJEU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cookie law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cyprus legislator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E-Privacy Directive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU Data Retention Directive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eu law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[european data protection law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gdpr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GDPR imlementation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICT and privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal framework]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markoullc.com/?p=11510</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Christiana Markou takes a look into the law introduced in Cyprus for the effective application of the GDPR. The report shows how Cyprus has made use of the options allowed to Member States by the GDPR and comments on the relevant choices made by the Cypriot legislator.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="vc_row wpb_row vc_row-fluid tm-row-textcolor-default tm-row-bgtype-default tm-custom-20056">
	<div class="tm-bg-overlay"></div><!-- ThemeMount custom DIV added -->
	


<div class="wpb_column vc_column_container tm-col-textcolor-default tm-col-bgcolor-default vc_col-sm-12">
	<div class="vc_column-inner">
		<div class="wpb_wrapper">
			
	<div class="wpb_single_image wpb_content_element vc_align_center">
		
		<figure class="wpb_wrapper vc_figure">
			<a href="http://markoullc.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/cyber-court-pixa-1024x576.jpg" target="_self" class="vc_single_image-wrapper   vc_box_border_grey"><img width="1280" height="720" src="http://markoullc.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/cyber-court-pixa.jpg" class="vc_single_image-img attachment-full" alt="" data-id="11511" /></a>
		</figure>
	</div>
		</div>
	</div>
</div>




</div>






<!-- ThemeMount custom CSS - Start -->



<!-- Patch: This is to remove the closing </p> tag which appear dynamically -->
<div class="tm-last-div-in-row"></div>

<div class="vc_row wpb_row vc_row-fluid tm-row-textcolor-default tm-row-bgtype-default tm-custom-52695">
	<div class="tm-bg-overlay"></div><!-- ThemeMount custom DIV added -->
	


<div class="wpb_column vc_column_container tm-col-textcolor-default tm-col-bgcolor-default vc_col-sm-12">
	<div class="vc_column-inner">
		<div class="wpb_wrapper">
			
	<div class="wpb_text_column wpb_content_element ">
		<div class="wpb_wrapper">
			<p>On the 1st October 2019, the CJEU in Case C‑673/17 has clarified that Article 5(3) of the E-privacy Directive (the so-called Cookie Law) and the GDPR provisions on consent require actively signified consent to the use of cookies. Accordingly, the use of pre-checked boxes (and other ways of inferring consent such as from the act of a user reading a Web page) do not allow for the securing of valid user consent. This approach is consistent with consent requirements in other contexts, such as Article 22 of the Consumer Rights Directive. The said provision specifically states that that pre-checked boxes referring to charges for additional products to be incurred by the consumer when he submits an order for a main product do not constitute valid consent to such additional charges. It would seem that consent means consent under EU law! The approach taken by the CJEU is also consistent with the views expressed a few years ago by <a href="http://markoullc.com/lawyer/christiana-markou/">Christiana Markou</a>, lawyer of our office, when she illustrated that Data Protection Authorities and other officials were wrong in the way they were interpreting the relevant (cookies) provision of the e-Privacy Directive, perhaps due to the strong business resistance towards the relevant consent requirement. You can find her related work titled Markou, C. Behavioural Advertising and the New &#8220;EUCookie Law&#8221; as a Victim of Business Resistance and a Lackof Official Determination. Data Protection on the Move: Current Developments in ICT and Privacy/Data Protection (2016), 213–247 here: <a href="https://www.springerprofessional.de/behavioural-advertising-and-the-new-eu-cookie-law-as-a-victim-of/7085912%22" target="_blank" rel="noopener" data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.springerprofessional.de/behavioural-advertising-and-the-new-eu-cookie-law-as-a-victim-of/7085912%2522&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1571318360817000&amp;usg=AFQjCNE1pj-dlKs0vaXSZW0Z9P4zmDvfhA">https://<wbr />www.springerprofessional.de/<wbr />behavioural-advertising-and-<wbr />the-new-eu-cookie-law-as-a-<wbr />victim-of/7085912</a></p>

		</div>
	</div>
		</div>
	</div>
</div>




</div>






<!-- ThemeMount custom CSS - Start -->



<!-- Patch: This is to remove the closing </p> tag which appear dynamically -->
<div class="tm-last-div-in-row"></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
